Man accused of domestic violence standing by window.

If someone accuses you of sexual assault, do not contact the accuser and do not speak with law enforcement before calling a lawyer. Even when an encounter felt consensual at the time, an accusation can quickly turn into a criminal investigation, and early missteps can have lasting consequences. What you say, text, or agree to in the first hours or days may be reviewed, recorded, and reused later, often in ways you did not expect. 

Taking a pause and getting legal guidance right away is one of the most effective ways to protect yourself and avoid making the situation worse.

Stop and Protect Yourself Immediately

Once you know an accusation has been made, your priority should be protecting your rights, not trying to fix the situation yourself. Investigators are trained to collect statements, not to sort out misunderstandings.

That means resisting the urge to explain, apologize, or clear things up on your own.

Do Not Talk to Law Enforcement Without a Lawyer

You may be contacted by a detective who asks for “your side of the story.” This can sound informal or reassuring, but it is still part of an investigation.

Anything you say can be:

  • Taken out of context
  • Compared against other statements for inconsistencies
  • Used later, even if charges are not filed right away

Police are also allowed to use deceptive tactics during interviews, including suggesting they have evidence they do not actually possess. Once a statement is made, it cannot be taken back.

Do Not Provide a Written Statement

Written statements create permanent records that prosecutors can rely on. Even small wording choices can become a focal point later.

Before agreeing to anything in writing, talk with counsel who understands how sexual assault cases are investigated and charged in Washington.

Do Not Take a Polygraph to “Clear Things Up”

Polygraph tests are subjective and influenced by many factors, including stress, medication, and how questions are framed. Results are often unreliable and can raise new issues instead of resolving the accusation.

If testing is ever considered, it should only happen after legal advice and under conditions that protect you.

Do Not Contact the Accuser

Reaching out to the accuser can create new legal problems, even if your intent is to understand what is happening.

Contact may be framed as:

  • Harassment
  • Witness tampering
  • Evidence of intimidation

Once an accusation exists, any communication should stop. Let your attorney handle all contact through proper channels.

Save and Preserve Relevant Evidence

While you should not create new communications, you should preserve existing ones. Messages and records often matter in cases involving consent.

Preserve items such as:

  • Text messages, emails, or direct messages
  • Photos or videos
  • Call logs
  • Cards or written notes

Do not alter, delete, or forward materials. Keep them exactly as they are and share them only with your attorney.

An accusation can lead to multiple proceedings at the same time, including:

Statements made in one setting can affect another. That is why timing and coordination matter. Acting too quickly or without guidance can close off options that would otherwise be available.

How We Help When You Are Facing an Accusation

At Jennifer Horwitz Law, we work with people at the earliest stages of sexual assault allegations, often before charges are filed. Our role is to protect your rights, manage communication, and help shape the direction of the case.

We assist by:

  • Intervening with law enforcement when appropriate
  • Advising you on what not to say or do
  • Responding to protection order requests without compromising your silence
  • Reviewing evidence for context and consistency

Early involvement allows us to reduce risk and avoid preventable damage.

Take Control Before the Accusation Controls You

An accusation does not equal guilt, but it does require a careful response. Waiting, explaining, or acting on instinct can make the situation worse. Jennifer Horwitz offers one-hour paid consultations and limited-scope support for individuals who need immediate guidance on how to protect themselves, respond to an accusation, or understand their legal exposure without committing to full representation. In many cases, focused advice early on can prevent serious missteps.

Contact Jennifer Horwitz Law to schedule a confidential consultation and discuss next steps.

A couple meeting with attorney to discuss sexual assault allegation.

A false accusation of sexual assault places your reputation, livelihood, and freedom on the line. But what happens if the allegations are from months or even years ago?  Below is an overview of some steps you can take to protect yourself when facing a delayed accusation of a sexual assault. 

Do Not Meet with Law Enforcement or Give a Statement

Law enforcement may reach out to you to make you aware of the accusation and to get “your side of the story.”  You should consult an experienced criminal defense attorney who handles sexual assault cases before meeting with law enforcement or speaking with them by phone.  If law enforcement calls you, obtain the name, direct phone number and/or email of the person calling and politely tell them that you are not in a position to speak with them right now.

It is important that you not subject yourself to questioning from law enforcement without consulting an attorney.  Your attorney can communicate with law enforcement to determine the specific nature of the allegation and time period of the accusation. Law enforcement officers are trained to use tactics to confuse you or get you to admit things that might help their case before you even understand the nature of the allegations. Law enforcement may make you feel like the whole issue will be put to rest if you just cooperate, but do not fall into this trap. Law enforcement is allowed to mislead you in order to further the investigation of their case.

Do Not Voluntarily Provide a DNA Sample

Often there is no physical evidence such as DNA from a crime victim who delays their report of a crime.  However, it is always possible that the accuser has an item of clothing or something else that they will produce to law enforcement at the time of their report to attempt to bolster their claim.  The safest course of action is to decline to voluntarily provide a DNA sample until you have consulted with an experienced criminal defense attorney who can advise you.

Do Not Agree to Take a Polygraph By Law Enforcement

Sometimes law enforcement will suggest that you take a polygraph to show that you did not commit the crime that you have been accused of.  Do not agree to take a polygraph without consulting an experienced criminal defense attorney first. Polygraphs are highly subjective tests and the stressful environment of being administered a polygraph by law enforcement can influence the results.  In other words, an innocent person can “fail” a polygraph, due to the stress of taking the test, unrelated mental health issues or medications they are taking. If you retain an experienced criminal defense attorney, they will have their own relationships with polygraphers who work with them.  They can work with the polygrapher to come up with relevant questions and to create a setting that is less stressful than a law enforcement setting. A polygraph administered by a defense polygrapher also does not have to be shared with anyone if it is not helpful to the defense. Do not consent to a law enforcement polygraph test, even if police are telling you they are administering the test to “clear” you of the accusations.

Be Aware of Law Enforcement Search and Seizure Tools

Law enforcement has several tools at their disposal to further the investigation of their case.  It is important if you become aware that someone has come forward with a delayed report of a sexual assault that you understand tools law enforcement could use to further investigate the case.

Law enforcement could request a search warrant of your home, car or storage space if they are able to articulate probable cause to believe they will find evidence of the crime in those areas.  With a delayed reporting situation, a warrant might not be granted because of the argument that the search is not timely and the issue is “stale.” However, there are searches that law enforcement can conduct without a search warrant.  For example, they can search garbage and recycling put outside your house without a warrant. This includes recovering cigarette buts or other items that might contain your DNA.

In addition, law enforcement can obtain a warrant to record a phone conversation between you and your accuser.  Washington is a two-party consent state and recording conversations between two people is illegal without the consent of both parties or a warrant.  It is a common law enforcement tactic in delayed reporting cases to have the accuser call the person they say abused or assaulted them (if they are not strangers) and confront them with the accusation to see how the accused responds.  These recorded calls, obtained after securing a warrant, can yield important evidence for the prosecution of the case. There is also a concern about the crime of witness tampering if there is a conversation with the accuser where it appears that the person accused is trying to discourage the accuser from pursuing the accusation.  

The lesson here is to be very careful in your further communications with the person who you have learned made a delayed accusation of sexual assault.  

Consult an Attorney Before Responding to Contact from Child Protective Services

If the report of sexual assault is against a child and you still have children living in your home, it could trigger an investigation by Child Protective Services (CPS).  It is important that you consult with a qualified attorney before speaking with an investigator for CPS because the information gathered by CPS could be shared with law enforcement.  Additionally, a CPS investigation could have important consequences for you or your family, depending on the outcome of the CPS investigation. A qualified criminal defense attorney can help you navigate a CPS investigation in a setting where there may also be an investigation by law enforcement.

Hire an Attorney with Experience Defending Sexual Assault Cases Immediately

A delayed report of sexual assault is a unique situation that can benefit from the immediate involvement of legal counsel.  This is true even if charges have not been filed. It could make an important difference in your situation if you immediately contact a sex crime defense attorney and only discuss the accusation against you with that attorney.  You should not discuss the details of your case or the accusation with the police, the accuser, a therapist or even your family until you have first contacted an attorney. An attorney will advise you on how to proceed and will defend your innocence based on a number of common weaknesses in cases involving delayed reports of sexual assault, including:

Lack of physical evidence

When a significant amount of time has passed since the alleged crime, this can make it difficult for investigators to build a case of sexual assault. A long delay may result in a lack of DNA and other biological evidence. In addition, there may not be pictures or other documentation of physical injuries that the accuser alleges they suffered from the event. 

Memory issues

In cases in which there isn’t any physical evidence, a complainant’s ability to recount specific details of the event is extremely important to his or her case. When this information is lacking or inconsistent, your attorney may be able to use this to make your case stronger.

If you are facing a delayed accusation of sexual assault, contact Jennifer Horwitz Law today

As noted above, if you’re facing a delayed accusation of sexual assault in Seattle, you should hire an attorney as soon as possible. Even if you haven’t been formally charged with a crime, you need an experienced and knowledgeable attorney on your side. Jennifer Horwitz has both the experience and expertise to defend you against a delayed report of a sexual assault. 

Jennifer Horwitz is a criminal defense attorney who has spent her career representing clients who’ve been accused of committing rape and other sex crimes. A graduate of Harvard Law School, Jennifer has a strong track record of obtaining dismissals, reduced charges and not-guilty verdicts in rape cases. 


DISCLAIMER: This post is intended to share my perspective, insights and some general information on various aspects of criminal cases. It is not legal advice and is not intended to substitute for legal advice. You should consult an attorney to obtain legal advice for your individual situation and case. 

Attorney and man discussing legal documents

When an individual in Washington is accused of domestic violence, the court frequently issues a no-contact order. There are two types of no contact orders in Washington: (1) pre-trial and (2) post-conviction. Both types of no-contact orders prevent the person accused in a domestic violence case from having contact with the alleged victim. Below is an overview of no-contact orders in Washington. No contact orders are different from civil protection orders that can be obtained in a number of situations. Read this blog on the different types of protection orders if you are interested in protection orders that are not connected to a criminal case. 

Pre-Trial No Contact Orders  

A pre-trial no contact order can preclude contact between the person charged and:

  • The alleged victim of the domestic violence crime, 
  • The children of the person charged if they were present for the alleged crime or are, themselves alleged to be the victims of the crime;
  • The alleged victim’s workplace and home (even if the person charged also lives there).

People are often surprised to learn that a pre-trial no-contact order can force the person accused of domestic violence out of his or her home and can keep them apart from their children before there is even a conviction for a crime. And unfortunately, a pre-trial no-contact order remains in place until the case is resolved or the judge specifically orders it lifted. 

How Does a Pretrial No Contact Order Get Lifted or Modified?

Typically, a pretrial no contact order will only be lifted or modified at the request of the alleged victim.  The alleged victim must work with their attorney or the victim advocate to set a hearing to address the no contact order.  Modifications might include allowing phone or email contact to discuss financial issues or issues around shared children, sharing “custody” of pets, or allowing contact within the confines of a couples’ counseling appointment. 

The court may be willing to lift a no contact order, especially if there is evidence the accused is addressing some underlying issue that may have led to the accusation, such as substance abuse issues, but the court also may only be willing to modify the order or leave it as-is while the case is pending.

Even if the accusation is false, the court will want to hear from the alleged victim on what their “safety plan” will be if the order is lifted.  A safety plan assures the court the alleged victim has a plan for keeping themselves safe in their dealings with the accused person. The alleged victim will need to work with their attorney or the advocate to develop a safety plan to present to the court.

How Does the Person Accused Get Their Personal Belongings out of a Shared House if a No Contact Order is Imposed?

The court will often authorize a one-time “civil stand by” for law enforcement to accompany the accused person to the shared dwelling to pick up needed personal items.  The no contact order must have a written provision authorizing a law enforcement officer to stand by in order for the accused person to avail themself of this option to collect their belongings.

Post-Conviction No Contact Orders

A post-conviction no-contact order is issued after a criminal conviction or as part of a resolution of the case. This type of order can carry the same types of restrictions as a pre-trial no-contact order. Post-conviction no contact orders generally stay in place for at least one year but can vary depending on how the case was resolved and what the prosecutor has agreed to recommend to the court.

Penalties for Violating a No Contact Order 

In Washington, the first-time violation of a no-contact order is a gross misdemeanor. A person who is convicted of violating a no-contact order can be fined up to $5000 and receive up to 364 days in jail. In addition, since the violation of a domestic violence no-contact order is considered a crime of domestic violence, an individual who is convicted of violating a no-contact order forfeits his or her right to own or possess a firearm–even if no gun was involved in the alleged domestic violence incident.  Multiple violations of no contact orders can result in several misdemeanor charges or felony charges for a third offense.

Let Jennifer Horwitz Law defend you against domestic violence accusations

A domestic violence accusation can be a life-altering event. If you’ve been accused of or charged with domestic violence, you should retain an experienced Seattle domestic violence defense attorney immediately. Attorney Jennifer Horwitz will treat you with respect and compassion as she fights to get the best possible result in your case. Jennifer has a proven track record of success in domestic violence cases, and she’ll do everything in her power to obtain a positive. Whether through her strategic negotiation skills or courtroom litigation experience, Jennifer has the tools at her disposal to fight your domestic violence charges. Please contact Jennifer today for a consultation. 


DISCLAIMER: This post is intended to share my perspective, insights and some general information on various aspects of domestic violence cases. It is not legal advice and is not intended to substitute for legal advice. You should consult an attorney to obtain legal advice for your individual situation and case.

Man arrested

A sex crime accusation can be a shocking, scary and shame-inducing life event. In addition to the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence, a sex crime accusation can carry requirements for treatment and registration as a sex offender.  It can also be a barrier to continued or new employment and can generally stigmatize someone, even someone who is innocent. Therefore, if you’ve been accused of a sex crime, you must take steps from the moment you learn about the accusation to protect yourself and maximize the chance of getting the best outcome in your case. Below are basic steps you should take after you’ve been accused of a sex crime. For additional information and to begin planning your legal defense, please contact sex crime defense attorney, Jennifer Horwitz, as soon as possible. 

Do Not Speak with Law Enforcement

If you’ve been falsely accused of a sex crime, it is only natural to want to explain yourself—especially to the police. However, this could be counter-productive to your case. Speaking to the police, your accuser, or anyone except your Seattle sex crimes defense attorney after you’ve been accused of a sex crime can only hurt your case.  Take the business card or contact information of the Detective investigating and tell them you will have your attorney reach out to them.  

Make a List for Your Attorney of Helpful Witnesses and Evidence 

Following an accusation of a sex crime, you’ll need to work with your defense team to gather evidence to support your case. Your Seattle sex crimes attorney and her investigator will help you do this. Common evidence can include:

  • Photos, emails and text messages from the time of the accusation;
  • Witnesses who may have been present at the time of the allegation or who witnessed something important prior to or following the alleged assault;
  • A timeline of the events leading up to the alleged incident, and;
  • Important information for your attorney to know about the alleged victim and why an allegation such as this may have been fabricated or brought when it is not true

Your attorney may also consult medical or other experts regarding issues in your case.

Don’t Contact Your Accuser  

As noted above, you shouldn’t talk to your accuser after you’ve been accused of a sex crime. While it may be tempting to try to work things out with your accuser without the involvement of the authorities, this may be viewed later by law enforcement or prosecutors as bullying or intimidating behavior or tampering with a witness, which is a crime. You should also be aware that the police sometimes have accusers contact their alleged attackers in an attempt to gather incriminating evidence and sometimes seek warrants to record phone calls or meetings between the accuser and the accused. 

Contact a Seattle sex crimes defense attorney  

Finally, if you’ve been accused of a sex crime in Seattle, Bellevue, Mercer Island, Sammamish, Issaquah or generally in the Washington State or King County area, you need to hire an attorney to defend your rights. Regardless of how strong you feel your case is, you need an experienced and knowledgeable attorney to represent you in court. At Jennifer Horwitz Law, we will defend you vigorously against sex crime accusations and charges. Jennifer Horwitz is a criminal defense attorney with 25 years of experience who has spent much of her career representing clients who’ve been accused of committing sex crimes. A graduate of Harvard Law School, Jennifer has a strong track record of obtaining dismissals, reductions and not-guilty verdicts in even the most serious types of sex crime cases. If you are facing sex crime accusations, don’t leave your future and freedom to chance—contact Jennifer Horwitz Law today to begin planning your defense. 


DISCLAIMER: This post is intended to share my perspective, insights and some general information on various aspects of sex crime cases. It is not legal advice and is not intended to substitute for legal advice. You should consult an attorney to obtain legal advice for your individual situation and case.

Man arrested because of entrapment tactics.

Entrapment

Entrapment is a possible defense to many types of crimes.  The defense consists of the argument that the crime originated with law enforcement officials or someone acting at the direction of law enforcement and that the person charged would not have committed the crime absent the influence of law enforcement.  When law enforcement merely provides the opportunity for a person to commit a crime, this is not enough to show that the person charged was entrapped into committing the crime. The person charged must be induced or lured into committing the crime by law enforcement. ] A lack of similar offenses in the accused person’s criminal history helps in showing inducement by law enforcement.

What Types of Crimes Might Be Defended with an Entrapment Defense?

Entrapment is a possible defense to any crime, but there are certain crimes that often lend themselves to this defense. Crimes that arise out of “sting” operations where undercover officers pose as sex workers in cases where people are charged with sexual exploitation (formerly patronizing a prostitute) or where undercover officers pose online as underage person conversing with someone about sex are good examples of cases where there may be an entrapment defense.  

Other cases where entrapment may be a defense are drug cases where an informant is acting at the direction of law enforcement in setting up drug transactions or child pornography cases where law enforcement is involved suggesting to a target that they can provide images to that person.

What Is a Sentencing Entrapment Defense?

Sentencing entrapment is an argument that, although the accused person committed the offense, law enforcement acted in ways to induce the accused person to commit a much more serious offense than they would have committed without the influence and inducement by law enforcement. Examples of this are drug cases in which an informant (acting at the direction of law enforcement) proposes larger and larger drug deals with the accused person or where the informant suggests the accused person should have safety concerns and induces them to bring a firearm to a drug deal, which the accused would not otherwise have done on their own.

Can a Private Citizen Engage in Entrapment?

An entrapment defense is not available when a private citizen acting on their own induces another person to commit a crime. Entrapment is only a defense when law enforcement works with someone outside of law enforcement who is acting at the direction of authorities in inducing the accused to commit a crime or law enforcement on their own induces the accused to commit a crime.

Barriers to Bringing an Entrapment Defense

It is not enough for law enforcement to simply provide a person with an opportunity to commit a crime, law enforcement must be involved in inducing or luring a person to commit a crime the accused would not otherwise have committed in order for an entrapment defense to be available.  It is best if the accused has no prior criminal convictions, or no prior similar convictions, to show that without the influence of law enforcement, the accused never would have committed the crime on their own.


DISCLAIMER: This post is intended to share my perspective, insights and some general information on various aspects of criminal cases. It is not legal advice and is not intended to substitute for legal advice. You should consult an attorney to obtain legal advice for your individual situation and case.

There are a few different types of protection orders and it helps to know which one you need and what type of conduct each order addresses.

1. Domestic Violence Protection Order (DVPO)

Domestic Violence Protection Orders are issued under RCW 26.50.030. A petition under this provision is appropriate when the petitioner is alleging a prior incident or incidents of domestic violence. “Domestic violence” means physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the infliction of fear of imminent physical harm, bodily injury or assault, sexual assault or stalking (defined in RCW 9A.46.110). These acts may constitute “domestic violence” if committed by someone’s intimate partner (this includes former spouses or domestic partners), a family member or member of the household, or current or prior dating relationship.

2. Sexual Assault Protection Order (SAPO)

Sexual Assault Protection Orders are issued under RCW 7.90.020. A petition under this provision is appropriate where the petitioner is alleging the existence of non-consensual sexual conduct by the respondent that would not be addressed by a domestic violence protection order (described above). A request for an order may be filed on behalf of a minor child or vulnerable adult and a child between 16 and 18 years of old may file a petition him or herself.

3. Extreme Risk Protection Order

Extreme Risk Protection Orders are issued under RCW 7.94.040. Under this provision, if the Court finds that it is more likely than not that the respondent poses a significant danger of causing personal injury to self or others by having in his or her custody or control, purchasing, possessing , or receiving a firearm, the court shall issue an extreme risk protection order for a period of one year. The Court may consider: recent acts or threats of violence by the respondent against self or others, a pattern of acts or threats of violence by the respondent within the past twelve months, any behaviors that present an imminent threat of harm to self or others, a previous or existing extreme risk protection order against respondent, a violation of a previous or existing extreme risk protection order by respondent, respondent’s previous conviction for a domestic violence crime, respondent’s previous conviction for a hate crime, respondent’s ownership, access to or intent to possess firearms, previous unlawful use, display or brandishing or a firearm by respondent, history of use, attempted us or threatened use of physical force by respondent and history of stalking by respondent, any prior arrest of respondent for a felony offense or violent crime, corroborated evidence of a controlled substance abuse or alcohol abuse issue, recent acquisition of firearm by respondent.

4. Anti-Harassment Order

Anti-harassment protection orders are issued under RCW 10.14.080. The Court will grant an anti-harassment order if the Court finds, after a hearing, that it is more likely than not that the petitioner has been unlawfully harassed by the respondent. Unlawful harassment under this section means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which seriously alarms, annoys, harasses or is detrimental to such person, and which serves no legitimate or lawful purpose. The course of conduct must be such that would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress and shall actually cause substantial emotional distress to the petitioner. A “course of conduct” is a pattern of conduct comprised of a series of acts over a period of time that show a continuity of purpose, even if the period of time is short. Constitutionally protected conduct is not included as part of a harassing course of conduct.

________________________________________

DISCLAIMER: This post is intended to share my perspective, insights and some general information on various aspects of Domestic Violence Cases. It is not legal advice and is not intended to substitute for legal advice. You should consult an attorney to obtain legal advice for your individual situation and case.

Many people from all walks of life find themselves facing accusations of domestic violence at one time or another. A majority of the people I represent on these types of offenses have no prior criminal history and are successful members of their communities, who have close relationships in their lives. A domestic violence allegation can come from a frustrated call to the police that the caller later regrets, a report of actual domestic violence or a fabricated or exaggerated allegation that is driven by legal or emotional forces outside of the reported incident.

If someone has called the police and reported that you have committed an act of domestic violence, you can expect that a detective will likely try to contact you for an interview. Consult an attorney before speaking to anyone in law enforcement, even if you think your statement will help explain your side of the story. You should not speak to law enforcement until an attorney has had a chance to analyze the other evidence in the case, because your statement will be used as evidence in the case. If you give a statement that is inconsistent with the evidence in photos, the 911 call or that of a disinterested third-party witness, your statement could be used to assist in your prosecution.

After a report is made to the police and fully investigated, it is referred to the appropriate prosecutor’s office for a prosecutor to review and decide what, if any, charges should be filed. Once charges are filed, a summons will be sent for you to appear in court, or you may be arrested and booked into custody until the first court hearing, depending on the severity of the alleged offense.

Here are some steps to consider taking after you know a report of domestic violence has been made to law enforcement:

1) Separate Yourself From the Person Who Called the Police:

If you live with the person who made the report, you should consider making arrangements for one of you to move out. This will provide a “cooling off” period after the allegation and make it less likely another allegation will follow on its heels, an event which will make the first allegation a harder one to defend. In addition, if the case is filed in court, a no contact order will likely be imposed, forcing you to stay away from the person who made the accusation.

2) Consult an Attorney Before Speaking with Law Enforcement:

Do not just give law enforcement statements that could be used against you without seeking legal advice.

3) Consider Hiring an Attorney Before the Case is Charged:

An attorney may be able to present information to the prosecutor considering whether charges should be filed and either head off charges entirely or prevail on the prosecutor to file less serious charges. An attorney may also be able to negotiate the opportunity to turn yourself in to be booked and released from custody, rather than arrested on the charges in front of your neighbors or at work.

4) Don’t Discuss the Incident with Anyone Except Your Attorney:

It is important that you not discuss the incident with anyone because your conversations are not confidential. Sometimes, a domestic violence allegation arises in a relationship that is already stressed. There may be a question about whether you should attend couples’ counseling after the report to 911. Discussing the case with anyone, including a counselor, may set up a situation where the person you discussed the incident with, is now a witness in the case. Thus, you may want to delay any counseling appointment until you can consult with an attorney. Also, do not discuss the case with the person who called 911, as you do not want that person to be in a position to suggest you tried to influence what they would say in the case, which could amount to a separate crime of witness tampering.

5) Tell Other Attorneys Representing You About The Report to the Police:

Many people are in the middle of an immigration case, divorce or child custody dispute when a domestic violence allegation arises. Make sure you alert your counsel on that matter to the report of domestic violence.

6) Seek Treatment if Treatment is Needed:

Sometimes a domestic violence allegation arises because some other untreated issue is now in the drivers’ seat in your life. Take a hard, honest look at this and if there is an untreated alcohol, substance abuse, mental health or anger management issue that needs to be addressed in your life, this may be your chance to address it. If you do not already have a treatment provider, this is another reason to bring counsel on board who can help you find an appropriate treatment provider.’

7) Consult Your Employee Handbook or Union Representative:

Every job has different rules about what employees must disclose. Some employees only have to disclose if they have been convicted of a crime. Others require that an arrest be disclosed. Do not simply tell your boss or human resources about the incident. Educate yourself on whether you have an obligation to tell your workplace about the report to 911 or your arrest. If you do conclude that you have an obligation to disclose your arrest to your workplace, consult an attorney who can help you strategize about how to alert your work and protect yourself in the criminal case.


DISCLAIMER: This post is intended to share my perspective, insights and some general information on various aspects of Domestic Violence Cases. It is not legal advice and is not intended to substitute for legal advice. You should consult an attorney to obtain legal advice for your individual situation and case.

In Washington, victims cannot drop domestic violence charges. Prosecutors control the case, and recanting a statement to law enforcement carries its own legal risks, including potential false reporting charges.

The consequences of trying to make a domestic violence case go away can be just as serious as the original charges. In Washington, once domestic violence charges are filed, the prosecutor decides whether the case moves forward, not the alleged victim. Prosecutors in Seattle and King County routinely pursue these cases even without the victim’s cooperation, relying on 911 recordings, police observations, photographs, and witness statements. And if the alleged victim tries to recant their original statement, they risk exposure to false statement charges, a gross misdemeanor carrying up to 364 days in jail and a $5,000 fine. A Seattle domestic violence criminal defense attorney at Jennifer Horwitz Law can help both the accused and the alleged victim understand their options and navigate these risks.

Who Controls the Case Once Charges Are Filed?

Once a domestic violence charge is filed in Washington, the decision to proceed or seek dismissal lies entirely with the prosecutor. The alleged victim does not have the power to “drop charges.” In King County, prosecutors often follow what is known as a no-drop approach, meaning they may continue prosecuting even if the alleged victim no longer wants to participate.

Whether a case can be pursued without victim participation depends largely on the other evidence available. Prosecutors can build a case using 911 call recordings, officer body camera footage, photographs of injuries or property damage, statements from neighbors or other witnesses, and medical records. If this independent evidence is strong enough, the case can proceed to trial even if the alleged victim refuses to testify.

What Happens If the Alleged Victim Wants to Recant?

This is where the situation becomes especially dangerous for the alleged victim. If a victim wants to walk back their original statement to police, they face a real legal risk. Under Washington law, knowingly making a false or misleading material statement to a public servant is a gross misdemeanor. If the prosecutor believes the original statement was true and the recantation is false, the alleged victim could face their own criminal charges.

Even if the alleged victim genuinely believes the original report was exaggerated or inaccurate, the act of recanting can be interpreted as obstruction. Navigating this territory requires the advice of an attorney who can advise the alleged victim separately from the defendant’s counsel. The same attorney cannot represent both parties, as the court would consider this a conflict of interest.

What If the Alleged Victim Is Subpoenaed to Testify?

A subpoena is a court order. If the prosecutor subpoenas the alleged victim to appear and testify, they are legally required to show up. Failing to comply with a subpoena can result in contempt of court, which may carry its own penalties including fines or jail time.

If the alleged victim does not want to assist the prosecution, they should consult with an attorney before the hearing. An attorney can explain the legal risks of refusing to testify, the potential consequences of changing their story on the stand, and any protections that may be available. This is not the same as the defendant’s attorney and should be independent counsel.

What Are the Defense Options for the Accused?

If you have been accused of domestic violence in Washington, an experienced criminal defense attorney can evaluate the strength of the prosecution’s evidence and develop a strategy tailored to your situation. Defense strategies may include:

  • Filing a motion to dismiss based on insufficient evidence, particularly if the case relies heavily on victim testimony that is no longer available
  • Challenging the credibility of the original report by identifying inconsistencies in statements, timelines, or physical evidence
  • Presenting evidence of reconciliation or context, such as text messages or emails, as part of a broader defense strategy
  • Negotiating with the prosecutor for reduced charges or alternative resolutions when the evidence does not support the original charges

A defense attorney who understands King County’s no-drop policies can position your case effectively whether the goal is dismissal, negotiation, or trial preparation.

How Do No-Contact Orders Affect Your Case?

Courts in Washington routinely issue no-contact orders in domestic violence cases, often at arraignment. These orders remain in effect regardless of the alleged victim’s wishes. Violating a no-contact order is a separate criminal offense that can result in arrest, additional charges, and jail time.

If you or the alleged victim want to modify or lift a no-contact order, you must petition the court. A judge will review the request and consider the safety of all parties. Do not attempt to contact the protected person until the order is officially modified or lifted by the court.

Talk to a Seattle Criminal Defense Attorney About Your Case

A domestic violence charge in Seattle or King County can affect your freedom, your relationships, and your future. Whether you are the accused or the alleged victim trying to understand what comes next, Jennifer Horwitz Law provides clear, experienced legal guidance. Contact Jennifer Horwitz today to schedule a one hour consultation.

Dismissal of a domestic violence charge in Washington is not automatic, and the victim cannot unilaterally end it. Whether charges are dropped depends on the strength of the prosecutor’s evidence and the legal circumstances of the arrest.

Domestic violence charges may be dismissed in Washington, but not automatically, and not simply because the other party wants them dropped. Prosecutors in Washington decide whether to file and whether to dismiss, and they have access to evidence beyond any single person’s account. Whether a case moves forward often depends on the strength of the corroborating evidence, the credibility of the witnesses, and whether the arrest itself was legally sound. A Seattle domestic violence defense attorney at Jennifer Horwitz Law can evaluate how those factors apply to your situation.

What Dismissal Means in Washington and What It Does Not

A dismissal is not the same as a not-guilty verdict, and understanding the difference matters. A not-guilty verdict comes after a trial, when a judge or jury finds insufficient evidence to convict. A dismissal ends the case before it reaches that stage, typically because the prosecutor concluded the evidence cannot support a conviction, a legal issue arose, or circumstances changed. Both outcomes end the prosecution, but they arrive through different paths and carry different legal meanings.

Washington law distinguishes between two types of dismissal. A dismissal with prejudice is permanent: the case is closed and cannot be refiled. A dismissal without prejudice leaves the door open for the prosecutor to refile charges at a later date, such as if a witness becomes available or new evidence emerges. Understanding which type applies to your situation carries significant practical implications.

When a domestic violence case is dismissed in Washington, any criminal no-contact order issued in connection with that case terminates by law under RCW 10.99. However, if a separate civil protection order was issued,  which is a separate legal proceeding, that order remains in effect regardless of the criminal case outcome and must be addressed independently. Once any applicable no-contact or protection orders are no longer in effect, the legal prohibition on contact ends, though a defendant should confirm with counsel that no other conditions of release or court orders independently restrict contact.

When the criminal no-contact order terminates upon dismissal, any firearm surrender requirement associated with that order ends. However, a separate civil protection order, if one is in place, may continue to restrict firearm possession under both state and federal law. And if the defendant has prior convictions that independently restrict firearms, those restrictions are unaffected by a dismissal of the current charge

Are Most Domestic Violence Cases Dismissed in Washington?

Domestic violence cases often turn on factors that do not arise in other violent-crime prosecutions. Many incidents occur in private, between two people, with no independent witnesses. Once an arrest is made under Washington’s mandatory arrest statute, RCW 10.31.100, prosecutors must independently assess whether the evidence is strong enough to charge and to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Victim non-cooperation and weak corroborating evidence are two of the most common reasons cases do not move forward to conviction.

Under RCW 10.31.100(2)(d), a police officer must make an arrest when they have probable cause to believe that:

  • An adult (18 years or older) assaulted a family or household member or intimate partner,
  • Within the preceding four hours, and,
  • The assault resulted in bodily injury, constituted a felonious assault, or was intended to cause reasonable fear of serious bodily injury or death.

When both parties have been involved in a physical altercation, the officer is directed to identify and arrest the primary aggressor. That determination is made quickly, often under pressure, and is sometimes contested once the full picture develops. Some cases therefore reach prosecutors before the evidentiary record has fully formed, and many of them do not clear the screening threshold for charging.

How Washington Prosecutors Decide Whether to Dismiss

Prosecutors in Washington evaluate domestic violence cases based on the available evidence, not solely on the initial police report. In Seattle and throughout King County, several distinct circumstances frequently lead to dismissal, and these are the areas an experienced defense attorney examines closely.

  1. Insufficient Corroborating Evidence

Domestic violence incidents often occur without independent witnesses. When a case rests entirely on one person’s account, with no physical evidence, no visible injuries, no damaged property, and no 911 recording consistent with the reported incident, the prosecutor faces a significant evidentiary challenge. Without proof sufficient to meet the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard, charges may not be sustainable.

  1. Non-cooperation From the Complaining Witness

Washington’s domestic violence statutes make clear that the state, not the victim, is the prosecuting party. A prosecutor can move forward without the victim’s active participation if other evidence exists. But when no corroborating evidence is available and the primary witness declines to testify, the case may become unprosecutable, and prosecutors sometimes elect to dismiss without prejudice, preserving the option to refile if circumstances change.

  1. Credibility Problems with the Complaining Witness

Inconsistencies between a 911 call and a later police statement, a documented history of prior false reports, or evidence of a personal motive for the allegation, such as an active divorce or contested custody dispute, can substantially undermine the prosecution’s case. When a jury is unlikely to find a witness credible, prosecutors may reassess whether the charge is viable before investing further resources.

  1. Constitutional Violations During the Arrest or Investigation

Evidence gathered through an unlawful search, questioning conducted without proper Miranda warnings during a custodial interrogation, or other procedural errors may be subject to suppression. When the remaining admissible evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction, the prosecution may have no viable path forward.

  1. Arrest of the Wrong Party

Washington law directs officers to identify the primary aggressor when both parties have been involved in a physical altercation. That determination is made under pressure and is sometimes incorrect. If the person arrested was acting in self-defense or was not the primary aggressor, that context may provide grounds for dismissal once the full facts are developed.

  1. Allegations That Cannot Be Substantiated

Some cases involve reported incidents that, on review, lack corroborating physical or testimonial support. Allegations arising from a heated argument or during a contentious separation may not hold up under prosecutorial scrutiny when the underlying conduct cannot be independently verified.

Washington prosecutors weigh these factors together when evaluating whether a case can be proven at trial. How each element affects the ultimate decision depends on the specific facts and what the defense is able to demonstrate.

What Does Not Automatically Lead to Dismissal

One of the most persistent misconceptions about domestic violence cases in Washington is that the victim can decide to drop the charges. In a Washington domestic violence prosecution, the victim is a witness, not a party. The city or state holds the authority to file and to dismiss, and the victim’s preference, while considered, does not control the outcome.

A victim who recants a prior statement or declines to cooperate does not automatically end the case. Prosecutors can still proceed using 911 recordings, officer observations, photographs, other witness testimony, and other physical evidence. Seattle’s domestic violence courts and intervention programs are specifically designed to handle cases where victim participation is limited, and prosecutors in these courts are experienced in building cases from available evidence. 

A victim whose later statement contradicts what they originally told police may also face scrutiny. Under RCW 9A.76.175, knowingly making a false or misleading material statement to a public servant is a gross misdemeanor in Washington. Prosecutors rarely charge recanting domestic violence complainants, but the legal exposure exists.

Talk to a Seattle Domestic Violence Defense Attorney

If you have been charged with domestic violence in King County or anywhere in Washington State, the specific facts of your case determine what options are available. Jennifer Horwitz is a Seattle domestic violence defense attorney with a Harvard Law education and more than 30 years of experience representing people facing serious criminal charges in Washington. Schedule a one-hour paid consultation to discuss your case directly with Jennifer, or reach out online to get started.

Domestic Violence Cases arise in a number of circumstances in which people from all walks of life can find themselves facing domestic violence accusations.  Charges can arise because someone in a family or romantic relationship lost control of their temper and actually committed an act of violence or violated a protection or no contact order.  Sometimes, a witness hears or sees an argument and believes that violence has occurred when they actually just witnessed a heated verbal exchange.  Domestic violence charges can also be fabricated by one party for a variety of reasons, including anger, retaliation or to gain advantage in some other context.  Domestic violence convictions can assist someone in gaining leverage in a family law case in which child custody is in dispute.  It can provide someone who is not a U.S. citizen a justification for remaining legally in the United States.  Someone may have fabricated an allegation out of spite or anger and now they feel they need to stick to their story since they lied about it, especially if they lied to the police.

Whatever the reason you find yourself accused of a domestic violence offense, you need expert representation in order to effectively fight the charge and obtain a just result.  Many people accused of domestic violence offenses have no experience in the criminal justice system and have no idea how to find the best attorney to represent them.

There are several ways to look for a good attorney online.  In looking at possible attorneys, read client reviews, if any exist, and also look for information about whether the attorney handles domestic violence cases regularly and with success.  Once you find an attorney that looks good, make an appointment with that attorney and consider asking these questions to help you determine if this is the right advocate for you:

  1. How much experience do you have with cases like mine?
     
  2. Does your practice emphasize domestic violence cases (do you have expertise in this area)?
     
  3. Can you give me a basic idea of how you will approach representing me and what you will do to develop a defense?
     
  4. How much experience do you have doing trials on cases like this and will you be ready to do the hard work of preparing my case for trial if that is the best approach?
     
  5. Do you have an investigator that you work with regularly who can help interview witnesses and who you trust to write accurate reports?
     
  6. How often can I expect to meet and talk with you while my case is pending?
     
  7. Will you personally handle my case from beginning to end or will associates with less experience be working on my case behind-the-scenes or representing me in court?
     
  8. How does billing work in your practice?
     
  9. What kinds of things will you do to try to save me money during the course of the representation?
     
  10. Why do you do this type of work and why would you like to represent me?

Just asking these 10 questions will give some structure to your first meeting with an attorney and listening to their answers will give you a lot of information about whether this is someone you can trust with your future and your liberty.


DISCLAIMER: This post is intended to share my perspective, insights and some general information on various aspects of Domestic Violence Cases. It is not legal advice and is not intended to substitute for legal advice. You should consult an attorney to obtain legal advice for your individual situation and case.